Find a Lawyer

ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LTD. THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER versus STATE

The ability to dismiss the petition against section 1A1A, 5435 and 9439 amendment orders was held by the Additional Advocate General stating that Section 6161A was not capable of postponing the trial under CRPC, Which is available to the courts under section 3535/999. , Reduce or limit the powers under section 6161t A, CRPC, PC High Court will exercise its powers under section 6161 AA, CRPC and interfere when it is stated that There was a gross abortion of justice by the lower courts in defining the evidence. Interventions were necessary to misuse the court process or to preserve the extremity of justice

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010

• BAIDULLAII JAN v. AURANG ZEB 2010 PLD 96
• PESHAWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. AWAL KHAN 2010 PLD 99
• WAQAR ALI v. State 2010 MLD 100
• Mst. IQBAL BIBI v. Mst. MARYAM BIBI 2010 PLD 105
• MUHAMMAD GHAFFAR v. Mst. IRUM 2010 CLC 106
• AFZAL MOTORS PRIVATE LIMITED v. HIGHER EDUCATION ARCHIVES AND LIBRARIES DEPARTMENT 2010 PLD 110
• ALI AKBAR v. State 2010 YLR 127
• RAFI-ULLAH v. Mst. SOBIA 2010 MLD 155

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2010 →

lawer from fb area from Sukkur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes