Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Qatil M. Bail, denying the plaintiff's counsel's contention that the plaintiff's party filed a cross-lawsuit under section 337 (ii), PPC. Was done and it was not. It is known who among the parties was the aggressor. Not every cross-case could guarantee the perpetrators privileges. It was not a rule, but it had to be kept in mind at the discretion and other attendance conditions, in the present case the present situation was contrary. The accused Prima Fees, a medical report, said that one person was hurt and the FIR suspect was accused of firing the victim and was also charged, in the FIR, on the same bullet. There was ample evidence of this. Associate the accused with the crime, unless the trial is concluded during a self-defense trial, which is a deliberate matter because when filing a cross-case, the accused party quit in his plea. Was. Such petitions can also be raised during the trial and not at the bail-out stage. The ocular evidence was against the accused and the incident was a daylight in support of the prosecution's stand and the possibility of misidentification was eliminated, the accused's active participation was proved in the file was the result of a shot and the shot was attributed to the accused. In which he was notified of a specific role in which the report was filed with due diligence and the mere fact of filing a cross case would not be of any benefit to the accused, in which case he was not entitled to bail.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
