Section 302 (b) Qatil appreciated the evidence. The complainant and the prosecution witness who presented a general account of the incident were examined at length, but their credibility was not shattered, which was the victim's brother. It is important to believe that because their presence was natural, the close relationship of the prosecution witnesses will not negatively impact their evidence as their testimony has been fully and substantiated by other circumstances in which the medical Witness testimony regarding the version and site plan and the non-witnesses can also be believed. And he could not be left alone on this ground, it was alleged that he was a partner of the prosecution's witnesses, false identity would not raise the question. If witnesses intended false charges, they would have been involved as well. The defendant was acquitted of the material by advertising, but did not adopt the method, which reflects the honest behavior of witnesses and dismisses false opportunities, prosecutors have alleged. Land ownership is a dispute, however, that alone will not be able to achieve this goal. If there was convincing, irrevocable and credible evidence in support of the litigation case, no contradiction was identified in the site plan, which was not a significant part of the evidence, but it was merely a In order to draw a valid conclusion, the trial court will consider the number of casualties on the death toll and the number of casualties.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
