DR. AKHTAR NAWAZ versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, GOMAL UNIVERSITY, D.I. KHAN
Article 199 Prior to the return of the constitutional petition civil service appointment, the initial applicants were restored to service under the judgment of the High Court who had attained final status as the order of rehabilitation followed by the order of reinstatement. It was said that the order of rehabilitation was withdrawn from the High Court without any notice to the applicants whose decision had reached the final limit which cannot be amended / amended by any institution as a Once the decision of the High Court is final, then its authenticity cannot be questioned once the rights of the rights are recognized. Ties. Unless a person was given notice, the notice was not given to the person concerned, whereas in the present case no notice was given to the applicant even if notice was not provided in the constitution. No opportunity for a pre-emption hearing was provided to justify the dismissal in favor of the veterans, who had the right to serve by an office order issued by the authority under the High Court decision which restored Was executed after the order of, had finalized. Disturbed, modified or altered by another authority, which was alien to the law and illegally declared the impeachment order illegal, void and without jurisdiction
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
