DR. SYED MUSHTAQ AHMED GILANI versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE, AYUB MEDICAL INSTITUTION, ABOTTABAD
Article 199 constitutional petition, restoration of civil service promotion and petitioners challenged the legality and ownership of the notification, whereby the applicant was designated as Associate Professor from the position of Assistant Professor and the respondents. Was promoted to professor and associate professor, respectively. The defendants initially raised the objection that since the employees of the respective colleges were treated like public servants, the applicant was required to terminate all available remedies against the order of the department authority, the counsel for the council objected. That the application is ineligible, which is not credible, the employees of the respective colleges were treated like public servants, but in the present case, on the recommendation of the Selection / Promotion Board, the competent authority in its meeting had applied to the applicant as an Associate Professor. Was approved for promotion and only served against the approved post Was Egypt. On the regular basis of Associate Professor; meanwhile, the other defendants were promoted as Associate Professor against a non-current position, and that the deputy director's audit detected unauthorized and unauthorized promotion and disciplinary and The chief executive's notice for collection of unauthorized and unauthorized salaries was brought and it was stated that the defendant was caught this way. Unauthorized and unlawful promotion against an unapproved post, but the chief executive has ordered the applicant to return the hearing and give the applicant an opportunity to be heard, without any notice, because the applicant was given permanent authority by the seniority. Low Fitness Basics
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
