Section 12 of the evidence (10 of 1984), Article 76 suit for the specific performance of the contract Secondary evidence in relation to the receipt allegedly received by the defendant from the scope of preparation of the secondary evidence The petition filed for preparation, was accepted and the case was settled for secondary evidence Appeal against this order actually returned to the plaintiff to represent it in the appropriate forum due to the lack of jurisdiction. When the document was lost, the secondary evidence was valid. However, it was important that the fact of the document disappearance should be proved first, when no document was proved to be lost, the secondary evidence would have no significance, even if it was presented, which would mean Secondary evidence is permissible; if the document proves to be lost (the defendant presented witness (one of them was a minor witness)) provided the original receipt but said during the renovation of the defendant's house. That the original receipt was put in the wrong place, however, it was not yet proved after recording of the secondary evidence that the contents of the document in question Whether or not they were true or not, in fact, under the law, the law was enforced under section 7676 of section 7676 of which was complied with. It did not have a negative impact on the plaintiff's case, only formally and there was ample opportunity to prove the defendant's claim by examining the witnesses at security. Courageous evidence and also denial of any unlawful motions or irregularities in the trial court by presenting its own testimony.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
