Section 302/324/120/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417, was 7/8 km away from the police station regarding the confirmation of the appeal of Qutel Ahmed and Qutal, but no attempt was made. A police report was made by the complainant about the incident to report the case, it was also made after a delay of more than three hours at the hospital, on arrival at A-section I at the hospital, The report was filed, counseling and deliberations are unlikely to be ruled out; there is no doubt that the three witnesses supported the prosecution's version, but their testimony Not only was this contradictory to the material, but the site's plans and medical evidence also faced direct controversy. Eyewitness testimony was mutually contradictory to the larger content. In view of such contradictions, the testimony of the witnesses was found to be reliable and unreliable, and the trial court's observations in this regard could not be ignored. And the suspect's recovery in the incident and the identification of the suspects were also suspected in connection with the testimony of the concerned factory security supervisor, who arrived on the first occasion, who stated that he saw no empty or blood on the spot. The police had recovered the crime from a place where the common people had easy access and the crime Hrk was denied testimony from the trial by witnesses of the trial. The acquittal partner was also denied under the law and the accused was declared innocent by the trial court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
