The suit below was permanently rejected by the two courts regarding the suiting of sections 6 and 13, and the plaintiff was not appropriate on the ground that the notice of seeking notice was not issued within two weeks within the prescribed period. And that the plaintiffs are extinguished. According to the requirement of the law, the right to self-determination for not adhering to the required `` negotiation '' according to the action taken by the plaintiff acquired the knowledge of the sale in question on 11th 1997 and was then intended to be vacated. Was shown e-torture and subsequently issued notice under section 13 (3) of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987 on 7/7 1997, the period of limitation from the following day After learning about it, it will start to run against the former empire. The sale and the first day, ie 11 7 1997, will be excluded from the count. If the period for limiting the performance of Talab Ishid is calculated in this way, then the notice is welcomed on the Student Publication Date 25 7 1997. Within two weeks, the decision and decree provided under section 13 (3) of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987 were set aside and the former umpires' appeals were pending before the court. Deferred, which will be decided after hearing the parties' order.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
