Article 114 Staple policy of the law was that the litigation between the parties should be permanently abolished, so that it could restore public order and maintain public peace among the people. Both can be justified against necessary and excessive litigation. Finally, in order to give the final effect of a lease, its merits were decided if such protection or flow of such litigation was not examined and dealt with under the law. The burden of litigation could not be reduced to control the rule, the final point being related to litigation under various provisions of the law, always targeting people belonging to the backward areas. As the trend goes on, even this trend has become famous, even in big cities, its roots have spread. That is why people and state pillars are unstable, which is why some legal provisions were introduced, such as the law, which sought to reverse the flow of such litigation, to comply with such provisions of law. In order to provide protection and protection to the people who had suffered and were still suffering. The requirement of the law is that it was ultimately and ultimately decided by a competent court / tribunal, which would be considered irrevocable legal fact because the law does not grant either party the freedom to reopen any matter. Was when it finally had to be reopened after a court decision
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
