Section 42 and 54 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 52, 53 and 172 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. XXVI, R1, Sections 9 and 115 (4) Declaration and Questioning of Permanent Prohibition The jurisdiction of the property was granted by the trial court to the jurisdiction of the trial court and the appellate court of the plaintiffs claimed that they owned the suit property, since 1940 the defendants have owned the suit property. Was listed in the Revenue Record. He claimed that in his favor for long, uninterrupted, unregulated and permanent entries in the Record of Revenue promoted the defense of the right even though he admitted that the plaintiff was a co-owner of the suit, but he claimed It was alleged that the claimant of the property was denied ownership. And claimed that he had actual possession of the suit property, counsel for the defendants stated that the property was not disputed in order to maximize possession of the suit property and that it was owned by the West Pakistan Land Revenue. Section 172 of the Act, 1967, was the exclusive domain of taxation powers, in which the power to issue a decision on any dispute-related matter was exclusively granted to the civil court, especially since the late record in the Revenue Record Was related. The matter relating to the appointment of the Commission to report the parties' actual possession of the suit property was already decided by the District Court for the defendant to have any substantive evidence, ocular or documentary evidence to suggest his actual possession. Failed to submit. Courts authorized to use their jurisdiction properly under the property
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
