In section 302/324/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A), in connection with the attempt to commit the murderer AMD and the killer, the appeal of recovery of the knife from the body of the victim has been appealed by the contents of the FIR. The role of the accused was not correct. The grave suspicion was born, which will go in favor of the accused. In the statements of the two witnesses, there were material contradictions, which were related to the alleged FIR. The purpose of the two witnesses was to reveal that both witnesses were in close proximity to the accused, the rule of the rule demanded that the evidence of such witness be dismissed It is important to do this and the litigation case is full of doubts and where there are many doubts, the benefit goes to the accused. The motif of the two witnesses' contradictory ocular account did not agree with each other. Medical evidence did not support the prosecution's version of the prosecution. In this case, the trial court did not succeed in proving its case. The evidence recorded on the record of acquittal was properly assessed when a defendant was acquitted by a court of law after facing a lengthy trial, and he earned the notion of dual innocence, with little or no interference. There can be no dispute, unless a strong and extraordinary basis exists in the order of their success. Ujayy, which face a reduction in the current case, the sentence is not sufficient to record evidence in this case, the appeal was rejected, the bad conditions
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
