A. XXXVII, R2 and 3 of the Talking Instruments Act (XXVI of 1881), the 118th case for the recovery of money on the basis of the claimant's note filed by the plaintiff by the court, the defendant against the judgment An appeal was filed and the order was passed by the trial court, the defendant alleged that the defendant had been admitted and there was a compromise between the parties, a copy of the pro-note was also obtained from the defendant's record. Counsel conceded that the loan was not repaid by the defendant and stated that it was based on the evidence of the plaintiff. Services that the contents of the agreement by the defendant has no objection to the order in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant had no benefit in the affirmation of the pro note by the minor witness, because there was no provision in the Apparatus of Negotiation Act, 1881, which prohibited the examination of the pro note by the minor witness, It reinforced the contents of the supporter note, which appears to have been retracted by the defendant in conciliation and consent, which resulted in the plaintiff proving her case through careful evidence, and the defendant's unlawful decision. The trial court was not proved, which was retained
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
