Sections 2 (c), (i), 13 (2) (i), (3) (a) (ii) and 15 Tenant's relocation and personal personal needs of the tenant on a default basis And the tenant's relationship was the appeal of the defendant / landlord litigation in the High Court that he had purchased his former landlord through a registered sale deed and the appellant was a current tenant. That the landlord raised the demand for vacant occupancy of the shop and the tenant was granted 1 time, subject to the payment of rent on six months request, but according to the tenant record On the basis, the tenant failed to pay the controller but the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties existed while the tenant failed. Pay the shop rent that the landlord personally needed for good use and occupancy. The tenants reluctantly excluded the landlord from paying the rent for which he was legally entitled to a substantial amount. On the basis of the evidence-based rent control question on record, there was scope available in relation to the need for a home in relation to the shop. The landlord and tenant relationship between the parties is right there. The tenant had failed to establish a legal title in connection with the purchase, but the landlord had been completely predetermined in paying the rent by the tenant and the landlord had rented for his personal need. Need to find a rental control based on. With the amendment it was maintained that the landlord leased the rent to the tenant
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
