Section 13 (e) Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 423 Arbitrator and Defendant Defendant Defendant Defendant It wasn't that he didn't. Want to file an appeal on the merit, if the court exercises the powers under section Cr2323, the CCP remains before the rest of the sentence as already one-third of the sentence has already been passed on the accused in the present case. The accused was charged with possessing only a handgun. There was no legal or legal title, no permission or license, and the amount of punishment was two years, but records have revealed that the accused was arrested on the spot while he was snatching a motorcycle against the accused along with his accomplices. However, the situation was not just in connection with the illegal possession of arms, but the major action was forbidden under section 17 (2) of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Jewish) Ordinance, 1979. The e-weapon was also in the works because the examination report said that the accused was further involved and a case was registered in the commission of major crime so it was not necessary for the accused to take action in this case. The defendant failed to identify the contradictions in the evidence and the trial court's decision did not require any illegal interference, in the circumstances an improper order was required
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
