Sections 514 and 561 include a panel code (XLV of 1860), section 109, 471, 420 and 406 order arrest, the applicant is guaranteed to bail out the petitioner and is seized in cash of Rs. Got rid of the bail The applicant failed to present it to the trial court as a guarantor and the trial court awarded Rs. 1,50,000 from the bail amount of Rs.2,00,000 submitted by the applicant. 000 was seized and the petitioner filed an application to revoke the said order under section 6161 AA, the PC's lawyer acknowledged the amount confiscated for the applicant. The reduction was requested, guarantee stability in the act of kindness for someone, unless it has been at any time guarantee the guarantee does not guarantee respectively. For the purpose or the economic benefit, it should not be treated harshly and should not be severely punished, demanding that the bond be completely confiscated without any unusual circumstances. The C trial court did not present any motivating reasons, as stated in sub-clauses (I) and (2) of section 514, to the CCPC, nothing was available on record to show that the petitioner The bail offered was for personal gain, but it looked like the trial was beyond the court and human rights, while seizing Rs 1,50,000 out of Rs 2,00,000. Demonstrated. An inquiry should have been conducted to reach a conclusion in respect of an amount of fines, but it failed to do so, after the petitioner reduced the fine to Rs. Rs
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
