Section,,, ,,, & & Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 248 Complaint against the eviction of illegal settlement Complaint residential building near the school building and applicant, on which the defendant forcibly Was seized, the petitioner's direction, the other complainant filed the complaint, the trial court took the matter seriously and proceeded, the respondent failed to explain how the property under question was occupied. I came to, the trial court granted an interim order under which the property was involved in the dispute, and it allowed the court to take the accounts Was appointed, during the proceedings, the complainant filed an application for withdrawal of the complaint under Section 248, CRPC, and the trial court allowed the complaint to be withdrawn by an unwanted order, the trial court found It was a procedure pursuant to Section 9 of the Unlawful Settlement Act 2005 according to the provisions of the Threatening Request of Criminal Procedure, 1898, that the trial court could not specify the point to be granted. Can neither discuss it nor give any reasonable reason to believe that in this case the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 Was filed in connection with the crime, which was a special law, under which this procedure was to be performed. It was observed that, during the trial / decision, there was no provision to withdraw the complaint in the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005 and once the complaint was filed under the said Act, it was decided by the trial court. Had to comply with the provisions of After reviewing the matter, he signed the Act
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
