Sections 453 and 380 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 35 and 397 of the locking house were convicted of corruption and theft together. The accused were sentenced in connection with two incidents; Gone. He was fined Rs 5,000 for two years on the charge of misdemeanor in the house, while under Section 8080 for the second offense, he was sentenced to three years imprisonment and a fine of ten thousand. Count the cases jointly because there was no trial court's directive to execute concurrent sentences, which would mean the defendant was denied privileges, the suspect was a teenager in poor financial condition. There was no such record as the previous offender, Len Lennant's approach was needed to fulfill the end of justice, allowing the accused's plea, directed by the court. It also said that both convictions in the two cases will run concurrently, however, the penalty for paying fines is not limited to prison sentences. Section 35, CRPC has stated that if there is no sentence of imprisonment, these sentences cannot be directed to run concurrently.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
