The testimony of the evidence for the recovery of unlicensed weapons was not denied by the accused at the time of the incident and he failed to prove that the weapon belonged to the accused. The accused further failed to establish his request. He was allegedly charged with the crime, during the trial he never raised the argument that it caused controversy at the relevant time and between the check post staff when the matter was discussed. Went and exchanged hot words, because of personal jealousy, he was wrongly involved in the case, the accused argued at the appeal stage. After which it was thought that the trial court had thoroughly reviewed the evidence on record and came to the conclusion, which was based on the material before the allegation, that the trial court's erroneous verdict was misleading of the facts and evidence. Identified an opportunity of and has no position to interfere with the trial court's findings under any kind of unlawful interference, it is alleged that he is fully qualified to present a case against Failed. Developed by the trial court, in the circumstances, remained intact
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
