The FIR, appreciating the Proof of Criminal Ordinance (XLV of 1960), Sections 8 and 13 of the Recovery Evidence of Criminal Ordinance, has shown that the rifle recovered from the accused was a crime under section 302/34. I was a criminal weapon, the PPC rifle was given a hearing order to be confiscated The section HA report attached to the probation officer's report revealed that the accused was found guilty under section 2302, PPC. He was sentenced to life imprisonment, in view of the facts involved and he was found guilty under Section 2,, PPC, while recovery of the crime was recovered from his possession. The R / Rifle was also affected, which led to him being sentenced by a non-judgment of the trial court. ? It has been alleged that he has failed to present a case in his case, there was no basis for any interference in the trial court. The defendant involved in the murder case and his conviction had established that the rifle recovered from him was a licensed, but his license expired in 1999 and has since been occupied with no legal title. Such a weapon would be considered as unlicensed weapon without license, would fall under the purview of section 13 (f), the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 failed to qualify any case on the accused. The appeal was dismissed and the trial court's decision upheld.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2010
