Sections 302 (b), 449, 452, 337a (II) and 337a (iii) Review of the evidence of Qatil-Um, home-abuse, etc. Take advantage of the doubt and contradict the complainant's statement regarding the presence and character of the accused. , When read from the site in light of the non-recovery of the pistol and the guards of the crime, his pistol was allegedly shot by the accused, examining the evidence of the accused's required prosecution at the site of the incident. The investigation did not prove that the defendant had denied the Lady Prosecution witness from his pistol butt due to the alleged injuries, when the court heard I submit that the trial court had acquitted the accused in doubt due to the fact that the suspect refused to participate in his presence, and the incident was not the result of the outcome of the trial. Improper brainstorming, misinterpretation, misinterpretation of evidence, but also based on accurate and consistent analysis and definition of clear principles of the Virtual Jirga Dennis High Court failed to apply the impossible test because of the trial decision. There was an imbalance to be disturbed, which was neither obverse nor artificial, shocking, ridiculous, lacking in distress or inconvenience or related to the misrepresentation of evidence. This could be simply a matter of disagreement over the scrutiny of the evidence, which had no basis for depriving the accused of the verdict in his favor, letting the High Court set aside the trial court's verdict and There was no justification for taking the place. Along with the sentence, the affidavit passed by the High Court was set aside and the trial court acquitted the accused.
