Section 8 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) rejected by the Senior Tribunal Service Tribunal, filed by the Government employees before the Supreme Court Advocate. The general had submitted that the original sanity list had been dismissed, as some people had died and some of them had retired. And the amendment / correction of the sanitary list is required The Advocate General added that the appeals filed by the appellant before the departmental authority against the defective list were not decided. And it would be in the interest of justice, if their appeals were decided for the first time according to their instructions, then the Advocate General was pending, if the appeals were partially allowed and the provincial government had no objection. Will be. Their overlooked decision was put aside by the appellants in the circumstances, they were allowed, and the undesirable decision in relation to finding the appellant was set aside and the competent authority was instructed in the department. It had to decide the pending appeals within six weeks of receipt. After hearing all the relevant, of the order
