Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY SOCIAL WELFARE WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND BAITUL MAL versus ABDUL MUTTALIB

Article 212 (3) of the appeal was upheld by the Supreme Court to consider whether the service tribunal needed to consider the effect of dismissing the representation of employees by the Secretary of Government. Whether the Circular Letter issued by the Services and General Administration and the Information Department 5 197 10 1975, employees are required to pass the Department Development Test (BS 17) under the rules and regulations to be able to further develop. Employees were entitled to the opportunity to be heard before the entire departmental examination was canceled and whether the service tribunal had instructed the department to declare the results of the test with a justification that had already been canceled, involved in the case brief Points, the office was directed to make important appeals on the existing record for hearing within a specified period.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• BASHIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2010 SCMR 822
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. SULTAN MAHMOOD 2010 SCMR 827
• MUHAMMAD RIZWAN GILL v. NADIA AZIZ 2010 PLD 828
• KAMRAN CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LTD. v. NAZIR TALIB 2010 SCMR 829
• Dr. AZEEMUR REHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2010 PLC(CS) 830
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN v. AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN through its Chairman 2010 PLC(CS) 833
• GHULAM RASOOL PANWAR v. FIA 2010 PLC(CS) 836
• CAPTAIN PQ CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. Mrs. ROMANA AMJAD 2010 SCMR 837

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Gakhar Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes