Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus SULTAN MAHMOOD

Arts 188 and 185 (2) (3) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Sections 96, 100 and A. XLI, R 33 Review of the Supreme Court decision The controversial decision of the High Court decision is appealing because of the district judge's contention. The Supreme Court upheld the appeal pending in this case without giving independent reasons to agree with the High Court and the District Judge for reviewing the High Court's decision, the Supreme Court said. In the case seized, either from the request or arising out of a direct appeal, the claimant will be bound to make a decision based on available material and After agreeing to the appellate court will record its conclusion with logical reasons. Appeal for re-hearing

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• Moulvi MUHAMMAD AZEEM v. Alhaj MEHMOOD KHAN BANGISH 2010 SCMR 817
• DEPUTY POST MASTER GENERAL, REGION-III, POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD v. MUHAMMAD JAVAID 2010 PLC(CS) 818
• SHAHID HAYAT v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 PLC(CS) 820
• BASHIR AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2010 SCMR 822
• MUHAMMAD RIZWAN GILL v. NADIA AZIZ 2010 PLD 828
• KAMRAN CONSTRUCTION (PVT.) LTD. v. NAZIR TALIB 2010 SCMR 829
• GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Social Welfare Women Development and Baitul Mal v. ABDUL MUTTALIB 2010 PLC(CS) 829
• Dr. AZEEMUR REHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2010 PLC(CS) 830

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Buchay Key lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes