Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM RASOOL PANWAR versus FIA


Sections 3, 5 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Release of show by the competent authority to reduce the mandatory retirement post They were later imposed. In connection with the notice and inquiry against it, the Service Tribunal, on appeal, changed the compulsory retirement sentence to three years with a reduction in rank. Under the disputed decision, the applicant legally received maximum relief from the service tribunal, which adopted a consistent view and reduced the mandatory retirement penalty. The service tribunal's position could not be interfered with as no further involvement in the case was presented. Counsel for the applicant does not believe that there can be no significant question under Article 122 (3) of the Constitution regarding the law of public importance. Was involved in this case, on the basis that the Court of Appeal's leave could not be granted to the court which the applicant \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Charsada lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.