PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINE CORPORATION versus TANWEER-UR-REHMAN
Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 30 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The terms and conditions for maintaining the constitutional petition were raised by the Pakistan International Airline Corporation Employees' Service Corporation that the Constitutional Petition before the High Court. Was not practicable and in the case of Muhammad, who was reported as PLD 2006 SC 602 and PLD 2007 SC 681, the case of Mohammad Idrees was applicable, even though corporate affairs While performing the duties in this regard, in the case of Mohammed Mubin Salam, the principle which the Supreme Court has proposed. The Federation, as yet agitated, cannot hear the High Court by hearing its constitutional jurisdiction. If any adverse action was taken by the employer in violation of the laws, then such action would be eligible for constitutional jurisdiction. But if such an action does not follow the laws. `` The principle of Master and Servant applied and such employees had to find a legitimate befo cure. PLD 2007 SC 681, shall apply to the general public. Article 199 of the Constitution had to file a petition with the High Court jurisdiction and refer it to the court at the appropriate time even though the expression was not available at the appropriate time: No source of law, however, was interpreted by the courts on the ninth day. Yes Pakistan International Airline Corporation was acting in connection with the affairs of the Federation but since the services of the employees were executed under a contract between the two parties.
