MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN DHANDLA versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL
Section 22 & Cri 63 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and the appeal of constitutional application in 1994 while the High Court was upheld, in fact, Returning Investigations. The officer, who filed objections to the jurisdiction of the applicants, said that the papers of the respondents, who alleged that the respondents were involved in criminal cases and that they were absconding in a criminal case. Could not prove with proof, therefore, the objections were set aside, the election An application was filed before the tribunal which led to his dismissal. Representatives were excluded from non-compliance with the provisions of section 63 of the People's Act 1976, and the appeal of the tribunal was barred by the ban on the petitioner's approval of the nomination of the respondents' papers. Also, the accuracy was rejected on the day when the nomination papers were submitted by the defendant, certainly not shown to the Returning Officer, especially in those cases According to the applicants \ as per their claim, cross the investigation stage in this matter Was not done Any order of the court before the Returning Officer or even before the High Court in which the defendants were found guilty was considered by the High Court as valid in its judgment and this matter The order was rightly maintained at the level of the investigating agencies. Section 121212
