Probability of Evidence of Prohibition of Section 2302 Qatil Im Represal In the absence of a witness motive, the absence of an eyewitness to the effect, the accused was sentenced to death under Section 222 (b), submitted by the PPC trial court, The complainant and the witnesses were witnesses by the court. Therefore, witnesses of the occasion cannot rely on their testimony, despite the lengthy scrutiny, the ocular testimony of the two eyewitnesses, looking at the distance from where the incident took place, remained constant and scattered where the prosecution witness. Stood and the other prosecution. The witness arrived at the scene of the complainant's residence and distance of travel, it cannot be said that the complainant was a witness of the occasion, both witnesses of the incident were natural witnesses because one of them was independent while the other, though not free, The son was dead but was a witness to the incident, therefore, his evidence could not be denied for any hypothetical reason, the third prosecution's non-examination of the witness's testimony, the only prosecution to examine any witness was the prosecution. , It is deemed appropriate that the absence of an eyewitness justifies the negative interference in the prosecution of such account. Will not present. The absence of evidence or the amount of evidence to which the defendant allegedly motivated the defendant or his weakness would not in any way negatively affect the litigation, as it was undoubtedly something that many Matters were found in mystery, it was only in the mind of the accused, who had committed the crime for the same reason, that the two courts, in keeping with the evidence contained by the prosecution in support of his case against the accused, were wholehearted.
