Sections 13 and 20 of the joint suit against the new owner have been dismissed by the court in favor of the plaintiff, as well as the lower appellate court high court, under the amended jurisdiction that the parties involved in the shop Were. The joint holding of the land under the ply question by the vendors was that the change in the account of their joint owners was recognized without any objection. Accuracy Wendy's has never defended its stake in the Khata and therefore has never encountered a problem. Such a request to become the owner in the joint litigation was never part of the appeal nor the basis for revision, so only because the shopkeepers were able to present the evidence because of their claim to share on the basis of section 20 There can be no change. Northwestern Frontier Province Pre-Empathy Act, 1987 Although this change was accepted by the trial court in evidence without objection by the vendors, the evidence that was brought to the record by a litigant, even by the opposing party. He was not objected to and was beyond the scope of his petitions, the court could not see it, but it should be ignored, the mutation in question could not be considered and relief was given to the shopkeepers. The High Court was not in the jurisdiction of the defense's jurisdiction. Winnipeg act was committed and the decision can not be sustained in law. The Supreme Court set aside the judgment and decision of the High Court in favor of appeal to vendors. Was allowed
