Section 379/427/447/506/511 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 14 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 249A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts, 185 (3) 199 Theft, loss of money, criminal misconduct and criminal threats etc. Alternative treatment under section 249A, which was taken by the accused by PC Paliah was not charged by the trial court thereafter. Therefore, alternative treatment was not available, legal challan was already offered, therefore, alternative treatment as an alternative alternative, provided under Section 249A, CRPC, is more effective, appropriate and effective. Decide guilt or innocence of the body concerned can not question the practice of the High Court. As a constitutional jurisdiction, such work falls under the jurisdiction of the relevant court, whereby the whole evidence was to be examined which could not be exercised in the constitutional jurisdiction. The doctrine of the police could not be considered sacred. The car was for the court. According to the law, the accused should seek constitutional jurisdiction to decide the question of guilt or innocence where alternative treatment was provided and what was beneficial could not be presented to the proceedings by the High Court. The refusal was denied and he was not guaranteed. Interjection appeal leave denied
