Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus STATE

Article 188 Review Petitions All the arguments filed in the review petitions were already comprehensively considered and it was decided that the Supreme Court Counsel for the applicant had fact-finding and once again the entire evidence was re-examined. Wanted to check which was not processed. In reviewing the request for review, the basis of the review cannot be made on the basis that it is necessary to re-examine the case on some additional grounds as well as on additional grounds, the review application was outside the scope of review. And accordingly, they were rejected.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• M. NAEEM-UR-REHMAN v. STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN 2010 PLD 949
• NADEEM alias NANHA alias BILLA SHER v. State 2010 SCMR 949
• Mst. MEHMOODA BEGUM v. Syed HASSAN SAJJAD 2010 PLD 952
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN DHANDLA v. ELECTION TRIBUNAL 2010 PLD 959
• MUHAMMAD WALI KHAN v. GUL SARWAR KHAN 2010 PLD 965
• SHOUKAT ILAHI v. JAVED IQBAL 2010 SCMR 966
• MUHAMMAD ABBASI v. S.H.O. BHARA KAHU 2010 PLD 969
• ASAD KHAN MENGAL v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL SHOUQ 2010 SCMR 970

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Ludhan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes