Find a Lawyer

KOHINOOR LOOMS LTD. versus MCB BANK LTD.

Article 22 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The petitioner's lawyer claimed that the High Court could not be justified in maintaining the order passed by the banking judge and the property was not specified. Defined by price. The High Court was abusive and did not conform to its market value, but the leave of appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to consider matters and any other issue.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• SHOUKAT ILAHI v. JAVED IQBAL 2010 SCMR 966
• MUHAMMAD ABBASI v. S.H.O. BHARA KAHU 2010 PLD 969
• ASAD KHAN MENGAL v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL SHOUQ 2010 SCMR 970
• ANWAR KHAN v. FAZAL MANAN 2010 SCMR 973
• MUHAMMAD KHAN v. ABDUL MAJID 2010 PLD 976
• ABDUL REHMAN v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 2010 SCMR 978
• Syed AIZAD HUSSAIN v. MOTOR REGISTRATION AUTHORITY 2010 PLD 983
• AHMAD NAWAZ KHAN v. MUHAMMAD JAFFAR KHAN 2010 SCMR 984

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

us immigration advocates from Shangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes