Find a Lawyer

MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LIMITED versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT), CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI

Article 196 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Detail of Imported Goods The concern of the property concerned was that the imported goods fall within the PTC which is applicable at customs duty 10A. But authorities applied the PTC's heading 8419 5010 and received customs duty. The imported 35 Val property goods were made of the shell as well as the tube, so, it did not appeal to the intelligent mind to like the shell or the tube, and to explain it in more detail. Confront Imported goods were correctly classified under the headings of PCT 8419 54010, as well as the Customs Appellate Tribunal High Court dismissed the appeal correctly and recorded by the following courts with regard to the importer. The appeal was denied on leave of absence.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2010

• HUFFAZ SEAMLESS PIPE IND. LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, HYDERABAD 2010 PTD 287
• CHAIRMAN DR. A.Q. KHAN, RESEARCH LABORATORIES v. Malik MUHAMMAD HAMID ULLAH KHAN 2010 SCMR 302
• PETROSIN CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. SINGAPORE v. OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. through Managing Director, Islamabad 2010 SCMR 306
• ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 SCMR 312
• Dr. AGHA IJAZ ALI PATHAN v. State 2010 SCMR 322
• Dr. PAKIZA RAZA HYDER v. MINISTRY OF HEALTH 2010 PLC(CS) 327
• PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED, RAWALPINDI v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, through Secretary Finance Department, Lahore 2010 SCMR 328
• GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. PAK. LTD v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR 2010 PTD 331

All Supreme Court judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes