PAKISTAN OILFIELDS LIMITED, RAWALPINDI versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB, THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE
Section 3 (2), Taxes on the Financial Vehicles Rules, 1997, Taxes on Pro 9 (IX of 1997), Section 7 were used under Section 3 of the Court of Appeal Maintenance Viability Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, with effect. Was alleged by the appellant. During the hearing of the petition before the High Court, the luxury vehicles imposed under Section 7 of the Punjab Finance Act 1997 were taxed, the luxury vehicle rules were taxed on 1997 and by the appellant the Intra Court of 6 10 1999 They were notified on appeal which was filed by the appellant before the High Division Bench. Contrary to the judgment rendered by a single High Court Judge, the court was used under Section 3 of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972, which was applied in section 3 of the Law Reform Ordinance 1973, and was used by the High Court. This may be equivalent to filing a request. At the time of filing / filing an application before the High Court, there was a law in which the appeal was certified. f That the court will not lie, a petition was filed before the High Court in November 1997 by the appellant under Article 199 of the Constitution, while the rules framed under section 7 (5) of the Punjab Finance Act 1997, The treatment was reported on 6 10. 1999, so when the petition was brought before the High Court, there was no law when the Appellant had no law to provide the remedy for the appeal when the constitutional application was filed by the appellant before the High Court. Until then no original decree was filed which could have been the basis for filing a departmental appeal. Constitutional application
