CHAIRMAN DR. A.Q. KHAN, RESEARCH LABORATORIES versus MALIK MUHAMMAD HAMID ULLAH KHAN
Section 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), sections 4 and 5 service tribunals, jurisdiction to amend fines, was charged with leave without leave and was dismissed from service but the service tribunal. Changed the penalties to lawful courts / tribunals after mandatory retirement approval. The matter was seized and strict orders were required to be passed under the parameters of the constitution and the rules and regulations. The service tribunal had no jurisdiction to grant arbitrary relief in favor of anyone who witnessed the service tribunal, which was two lines in its decision. For whatever reason, under the law as well as the rules on the subject and it was not sustainable, if the service tribunal had decided to amend the decision, it could have referred to a former employee's record so that the official One of the employee's past records is mentioned. Regarding the basis of the charge sheet, which was mentioned earlier, three warnings / letters of discipline violation were issued to the employee for unauthorized absence of the Service Tribunal. Exceeding its discretion in granting relief to the employee, therefore, the decision of the service tribunal was not sustainable in the court. Was allowed
