The petitioner, before the Supreme Court retention under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, in front of Article 184 (3) of the Articles 184 (3) and 188 Supreme Court Rules 1980, Article 184 (3) of the XXVI Constitution. Also filed separate revision petition primarily, the purpose of filing the constitutional petition was to try to achieve the same purpose which was the review petition, ie, on the exclusion of the review petitions filed against the aforesaid Supreme Court decision. Fail the Supreme Court decision. The court, the verdict was final and the present review request was entertained and not properly approved by the refusal to receive the same on a valid objection by the office of the court holding which was not directly obtained. What could be done, indirectly diagnosing this question was to validate the objections, to the touchstone of the principle that what could not be obtained directly could not be obtained indirectly, Article 184 (3) of the Constitution also condemned and Was unclean content
