Section 9 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O II, R2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Promotion Relief, relinquishing the effect of new applicant, frustrated the defendant's development and before the service tribunal. The question of extension of the appeal which was dismissed was a matter of commitment by the relevant authorities / forums / boards on the merits of the candidates required by the Supreme Court to express opinion on the merits of any of the competing parties. Petitioner's Appeal Case Rejected by the Service Tribunal, Therefore, This Issue Is Not Subject to Advertising Decision by the Supreme Court And might change due to leave after his challenge for respondents development and qualification and seniority, had refused to challenge the respondents to the applicant. The eligibility criteria for both BS 18 and 19 was the same applicant who dropped the defendant in his application. Their eligibility / eligibility basis in the development is therefore denied to prosecute the defendant on the basis of a claim dismissed under the provisions of O II, R2, the applicant's CPC indulgence and the defendant. Ali's comparative ability was not judged because of ignorance. The leave to appeal the refusal to appeal the delay to the service tribunal on the grounds that the exercise of arbitration against the applicant was unreasonable
