Establishment of offices AA (), 38, 66 66 and Federal 67 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of the XXXXXXV), Sections 2 (3), 9 and 10, in the approval of the sales tax staff. The delay visited the complainant's premises and under section 38 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, the proceedings seized all available records of sales tax, account books and related documents. And in its constitutional jurisdiction, the Department filed a criminal case against the directors of the complaining company for stealing the Sales Tax High Court and directed the department to return all the documents, records, account books seized. And other material to the complainants. As well as not using records, account boxes and other materials against complainants in court proceedings. The complainants had approached the department for a refund of Rs 6 lakh already paid by them, but the amount was not refunded. ; Disappearance of the Supreme Court against the High Court's decision and the complainants' response to dismissal is equivalent to a million million non-refundable and compatibility reminder of Section 2 (3) of the Federal Office. ? The Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000, recommended to the Federal Board of Revenue to instruct the Chief Commissioner to return confiscated records of complainants. In the light of the High Court decision, decide on a merit refund / comparison claim within 21 days. And report compliance within 30 days \ r \ n
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
