SPEL FUJIYA LTD., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Offices of Section 170 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Complaint against non-compliance with directions for approval of Section 9 and 10 refund claims, decided by the Federal Tax Ombudsman The department is required to issue a return claim in accordance with the law. In respect of each IT30 for the tax year, a review application is filed against the decision / recommendation of the order of return of the complainant or the department in which it is requested that the affected recommendation be reviewed and processed. Be stopped While dealing with all objections and pleas raised by the department and lack of duty and discretion in the payment of duties and responsibilities by the department, no deficiency or fault was apparent in the department but no action was taken on the merit department. Used to And complainant A's refund claim was delayed in settlement of the department's allegation of misconduct, the review request was dismissed because the officer responsible for violating the showcase notice Identify and instruct them within 21 days of the reason why the offending action cannot be taken. The charge against them was initiated under the provisions of Section 16 of the Office of Federal Tax, the Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 and shall be followed within 21 days of receipt of the recommendation of the Secretary's Revenue Division.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
