GHAZI-BAROTHA CONTRACTORS, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of Section 33 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (XXXV of 2000), Refusal of Claims for Section 9 and 10 Refunds Respondents ants numerous equipment for machinery, equipment, spare parts and construction equipment by notification of duties and taxes. Imports of the goods, the federal government has since granted the exemption from the full exemption of import duty and taxes, with the former effect, according to the complaint it submitted customs officials' refund claims from 1997 to 2005. Continued to pursue claims for return but to no avail despite the contract's specific disappointment Assistant Collector of Customs asserted that the rebate claims were initially timely filed with the original documents and that the Board of Revenue waived the time limit, despite the government's release. Was rejected by the original order of the complainant's second appeal was accepted by the customs appellate tribunal supporting the decision of the Customs Appellate Tribunal, claiming the customs authorities' full refund of the case for the past twelve years. Was not approved by Customs, which was the worst form of corruption the whole case has heard had gone. Repeated mischiefs were suggested, suggesting that the Federal Board of Revenue collectors instruct Customs to retrieve claims filed by the appellate tribunal within 30 days and return of the approved complainant. Initiate investigations into customs inaccuracies and numerous commission operations. Action against officers for corruption and misrepresentation of facts in the case and case
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
