FAISAL TEXTILE, INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD.GUJRANWALA versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Offices 4, 10 and 66 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of XXV 2000), Section 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 Request for condolences on delay in filing a refund claim Was rejected which was not able to receive input tax due to non-refundable input tax by the complainant, even though the product was zero rated, it filed a refund claim by the complainant. The refund claim filed was tale tale by day, he filed for the postponement, but his request was denied in accordance with the Federal Board of Revenue. 12 12 2007 notification was given by the collector to allow the extension of time to file a refund claim for the relevant period. The Federal Tax Ombudsman Secretariat also recommended delays in similar complaints, which were complied with by the Federal Board. In the present case, there was no significant order to dismiss the refund claim on the basis of the limit on which the complainant was treated in the present case in a number of matching cases issued by the Federal Board of Revenue. Permission to verify the delay was unjust, unfair and discriminatory in its treatment of the complainant, which is malicious under Section 2 (3) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Office. The recommendations of the Ordinance, 2000 were made to the Federal Board of Revenue to waive the delay in filing a refund claim. After providing the complainant with an opportunity to be heard, the relevant authorities are required by law to decide the claim for a pending refund within 30 days and
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
