GEOFMAN PHARMACEUTICALS, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION; ISLAMABAD
Establishment of offices of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000C), 19, 33, and 195C, was a drug and pharmaceutical manufacturer to dispose of Section 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 refund claims, Which included various IV solutions sold. Imported pharmaceutical grade LDPE granules manufactured locally by the complainant in LDPE packing said LDPE granules were exempt from the sales tax payment, but the department nevertheless Received sales tax from July 2001 to March 2006, but was rejected. , On two grounds; Whether events were approved or not. Accountants were also needed. And second, that the complainant's claim was barred under section 33 of the Customs Act 1969 record, which does not indicate that the department has ever imported additional evidence from the complainant, such as through an audit report and Asked to submit a certificate of documentation to prove the incident. Taxes were not terminated to the user when section 19A of the Customs Act 1969 was applied for claims related to the period before the registration of the claim, but the complainant was not accepted. Was not faced with the issue of limitation. And the claims of the complainant were rejected by the issuance of the letter which ordered the complainant to be able to appeal / review.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
