SYED HABIB NOOR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 2 (s), 16, 157 (2) and 168 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 V of 2000), Seizure and Disposal of Sections 2 (3), 9 and 10 Deputy Collector Customs (Precautionary) In fact, it authorized the owner of the vehicle, along with the motorcycle parts, to collect a fine of $ 50m on the payment of the penalty for the redemption of the vehicle. The appellate tribunal was excluded by the set. After the appellate tribunal's decision was passed in their favor, the two orders actually and the appellate order aside, contacted the customs collector to release the seized goods and return the fines, but their request Was dismissed on the ground that the appellate tribunal did not directly release the motorcycle parts seized in the order. Claims for a return penalty were similarly denied when the appellate tribunal was barred despite passing a second order. The auction continued with the auction and the motorcycle parts were eventually auctioned. After the Appellate Tribunal's order was approved, the Department failed to pursue an amnesty excuse to withhold redemption penalties for more than two and a half years. Complainants claim that the refund claim was time-barred, lacked any legal basis, after the order was passed by the appellate tribunal, withholding the return of the complainant's penalty, and customs. Auction of motorcycle parts through, was not a complaint of legal action. Return of fine fines and motorcycle
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
