SABA POWER COMPANY (PVT.) LTD., ISALAMABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
5, 7 and 8 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (XXV of 2000), Sections 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 of the order of transfer of the jurisdiction of the complaining company from Islamabad to Lahore Was directed against. It was claimed that the complainant had been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan at the address of Islamabad since 1999. Income tax was also reviewed on request of the company's sales tax registration in 2005, when the company's sales tax registration was transferred from Lahore to Islamabad. Yet despite the company's 16-year registration with the Sales Tax Authority of Islamabad, the Chief Commissioner Islamabad violated the Sales Tax Registration Rules 2006 and gave the affected company a chance to be heard before taking such a decision. Without unilaterally and unilaterally misleading the Federal Board of Revenue to transfer the jurisdiction of the company to Lahore. Any one, had to be used in accordance with some of the default parameters available under the Sales Tax Registration Rules 2006, thereby eliminating the possibility of profit, disobedience, injustice, injustice and judgment of the beneficiary interests of the representative of the affected parties. have to do it. Under the circumstances, parameters were developed to use arbitrary LTU Islamabad: the complainant company, the blasphemer and the complainant, were transferred to the jurisdiction of LTU Lahore, which abused their powers. Had been violated and not only did the complainant's fundamental right to be heard before such a drastic action was taken, but the RR was violated. Sales Tax Registration
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
