Attempt to compel Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324 / i37 F (i) / 337 F (ii) / 34 of Kalam Um, thereby canceling the bail of any person, Damia and Badooh. Granted, the rules for cancellation of bail were quite different. In the case of the bail approval principle, the record showed that two inquiries were made and both said that the accused was innocent. Albi's request was submitted by the accused. It was true that only a temporary diagnosis could be made at the bail-out stage, and that deep definition of the evidence was not possible; however, it cannot be stated publicly; Bail clearance was not used properly The affected order was neither breached nor was there any evidence of any discretion that the accused had misused the concession of bail. The possibility was not there and he was not in a position to tamper with the evidence. The request for prosecution for the cancellation of the bail was dismissed, in the circumstances \ r \ n