Find a Lawyer

MUFTI PERVAIZ MANZOOR versus STATE

Section 406 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Article 575 of Pakistan's Constitution, Article 199 Constitutional Petition FIRF is not listed after 4/2 years of the alleged incident and 6 months after the filing of the civil suit. Could have been done. It does not appear that record-based FIR can be justified; in the constitutional jurisdiction the High Court had sufficient powers to terminate the proceedings of a criminal case. If a crime is not disputed, in the present case, it was purely civil in nature, criminal under section 199 AA, CRPC, under Article 199 of the Constitution or under the High Court. Was switched to action. Under unusual circumstances, the FIR was abolished

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQ v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SHALIMAR, ISLAMABAD 2011 PCrLJ 958
• HOME LIFE through Managing Partner v. NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION through Chairman, Islamabad 2011 PTD 1007
• Raja SHAHID AHMAD v. NISAR AFZAL 2011 MLD 1079
• AKBAR SHAH v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 1175
• Ms. FARAH NAZ v. QUAID-I-AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 1259
• RAHAT ALI SHERWANI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Housing and Works 2011 PLC(CS) 1277
• ALI AKBAR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division 2011 PLC(CS) 1329
• MCB BANK LIMITED v. MILLENNIUM SECURITIES AND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED 2011 CLD 1355

All Islamabad judgments of 2011 →

lawer from fb area from Chowk Azam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes