HOME LIFE THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION THROUGH CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD
Section 11 and 52 National, Tariff Commission Act (VII 1990), Section 11 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution petition challenged the implementation of anti-dumping duty petitioners under which authorities / commissions Anti-dumping duty was imposed on the imports. The constitutional petition filed by the applicants earlier was dismissed and the petitioners rejected the High Court order and referred to the Supreme Court, the petitioners. The lawsuit was filed with the authorities / commission for its own prosecution, in which it was claimed As the Supreme Court ruled that the authorities / commission order was invalid and quorum invalid, the amount paid by the applicant for the anti-dumping duty was the responsibility of returning the applicants, causing the Supreme Court. The matter was not decided, but the matter was obtained on legal basis by the authorities / Commission and the remand was given to the Commission to issue the issue of the anti-dumping duty imposition of anti-dumping duty that the current price in the importer country. Could not sell articles for less than where it was said that the articles were imported. It was a special priority of the National Tariff Commission to authorize or deny the refund. The Authority / Commission had to record the evidence and pass the order on the basis of the evidence. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court did not enter into a factual dispute. And neither can it be investigated. Applicants 'Claims Applicants' basic claim is still pending before the Commission. And the Supreme Court made the case
