SAFDAR ALI versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION BAHARA-KAHU, ISLAMABAD
Sections 22A and 22B had no jurisdiction over the scope of justice and jurisdiction of justice, and such powers, which could be called judicial, were merely administrative and ministerial duties performed by the Office of Justice. And the proceedings before the Justices, Section 22A (6), peace under CCPC, were primarily summary of the role. Notice of such action, if required, may be issued only to the relevant police officer. And not to any private party because there is no direction against any private party. The direction of the officer concerned in the execution of any legal action of the complaining person in such proceedings cannot be termed effective for any other party, even to the police officer in compliance with the law Direction cannot be called direction. Against another person, under Section 22A (6), the CR PC, Justice of the Peace, after examining the information, had to decide whether there was an unrecognizable offense and whether the CE was acquitted and the dispute The order was to be passed without a trial or a mini-trial, since the Justice of Peace did not have to decide the rights of the parties, so they should not have gone to the point of passing the judicial decision. Under Section 22A&22B, the PCs were not required to issue notices to persons against whom registration of the case was required, but they were required to call the relevant police officer to direct him to file the case. Can be released \ r \ n