AYAZ AHMED MEMON versus PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, ISLAMABAD
The applicant was employed on the contract for a period of three years on the basis of Arts 199 and 3 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment Agreement, but said the contract was continued year by year and continued for more than 7 years. Had prayed that she be treated permanently. The employee, as a result, is entitled to all privileges. If the position at which the applicant was appointed was permanent, he should have filled in the last 6 years or more, but this was not done, as such. Was one of the most famous types. That a person was hired on a permanent contract and thus continued from year to year. Putting this person on the basis of uncertainty with the sword of instability is not a permanent way to hang on his head, but the most delicate thread of a superior knot cannot do such a thing and allow it. The department should not be instructed to assess the applicant's suitability for permanent absorption in the post; and then proceed with the law, within a period of two months.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
