Find a Lawyer

EXECUTION APPLICATION BY MUHAMMAD ARMED versus

O XXI, R 58 Execution The property of the property attached is the property of the petitioner objector which is properly enclosed and cannot be sold in execution of the decree passed against the defendant of the judgment; and that The deciding lender used to buy property anonymity in the name of others in order to avoid its obligations, the objection filed by the objection shows that the enclosed property is in his name and he has filed against the decedent At the point of purchase execution long before litigation, do not wear such a question. And how could he have been allowed to object to the object were funded to buy the property and the property was going to be linked to conditions.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• Mst. ILYAS BEGUM v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY 2011 PLD 281
• AYAZ AHMED MEMON v. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 281
• TEAM NAYYER (PVT.) LIMITED through Authorized Attorney v. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LIMITED 2011 CLD 285
• KHADIM HUSSAIN v. State 2011 MLD 288
• Syed JEHANGIR ALI v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, HYDERABAD 2011 PLD 293
• Syed ASADUL HAQ v. BALOCHISTAN GLASS LIMITED 2011 CLC 294
• Mst. SANAM BABY v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Health Department 2011 PLD 297
• MUHAMMAD RAHEEM v. State 2011 YLR 298

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

top advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes