MST. ILYAS BEGUM versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY
OI, R 10 (2) Delegation Act (IX of 1908), Section 22 Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), Sections 42 and 54, Plot intervention for decree and permanent injunction 159 1976 Plaintiff's dismissal of the plot by the Housing Authority and its transfer to the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff 20 3 1978 in accordance with the 26 26 2005 suit filed by the plaintiff in 2009 against the housing authority. Through a letter filed to invalidate the cancellation and to prevent the Authority from permanently forming a third party. The petitioner was charged with signing the transfer document in favor of the claimant in his petition on 13 1 2009 to submit the request by the interlocutor. The exchange of litigation to copy the interceptor came into effect in favor of the plaintiff on 30 March 1980 and since then he was in his own right to bring nothing to the intervention. It had taken steps before the Housing Authority from 1976 to 265 2005, until the issuance of an unidentified letter from the Authority, when the interlocutor in its application had not given a specific date for the absence of the case nor Definition of making such an application in the year of the Offering was filed by the Defendant beyond the limitation limit. The illegal rum and Housing Authority letter had prayed for issuing guidance to implement the lease in connection with the plot set in its own right. The appropriate parties in the proceedings will be those who are interested in the challenge and cannot be judged on their merits without their presence.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
